In today's financial world, compliance teams are drowning. There's no other way to put it. Between the myriad chatting/texting apps and traditional emails, the volume of daily communications requiring review has exploded beyond what any human team can realistically handle. Yet regulatory expectations haven't decreased—they've intensified.
Here's where things get interesting. While artificial intelligence (AI) offers a lifeline for processing these massive data volumes, we're seeing some firms make a critical mistake: they're either going all-in on AI automation or completely avoiding it out of fear. Both approaches miss the mark.
The sweet spot? A human-in-the-loop approach where AI handles what it does best—data aggregation and pattern detection—while compliance officers and supervisors provide the nuanced judgment that only humans can deliver. This isn't just about efficiency; it's about creating defensible surveillance decisions that regulatory bodies will respect.
Let's be honest about AI's limitations. Sure, it can flag thousands of messages containing suspicious keywords in seconds. But can it tell the difference between an advisor discussing a client's "confidential estate planning" and someone sharing material non-public information? Not reliably.
FINRA Rule 3110 makes this crystal clear—firms must maintain supervisory systems that are "reasonably designed" to achieve compliance. Notice the emphasis on "reasonably designed." This means understanding how your tools work and ensuring their outputs align with your legal obligations. The SEC's recent Roundtable on AI emphasized that while AI can enhance surveillance capabilities, human validation remains essential to interpret findings and avoid false positives.
Consider this real-world scenario: An AI system flags frequent mentions of "gift cards" in an advisor's communications. Without human context, this might trigger a gifts and entertainment policy violation alert. But a human reviewer quickly recognizes these are legitimate discussions about client holiday bonuses structured as gift cards—completely compliant and properly documented. That's the difference between smart automation and intelligent oversight.
Here's how some leading firms are structuring their surveillance programs to leverage both AI efficiency and human expertise:
Some smart firms use AI to handle the heavy lifting: scanning communications across all channels, identifying patterns that might indicate violations, and prioritizing alerts based on risk levels. Modern AI tools can process natural language in real-time, detecting not just keywords but sentiment, context, and relationship patterns.
For AML and KYC compliance specifically, AI can excel at:
But here's where human expertise becomes irreplaceable. Compliance officers and supervisors need to:
Think about customer due diligence communications. An AI might flag a conversation where an advisor asks detailed questions about a client's source of funds. A human reviewer can quickly determine whether this represents proper enhanced due diligence for a high-risk client or potentially inappropriate prying that could damage the client relationship.
One area where human-AI collaboration proves especially valuable is integrating AML and KYC compliance into communications surveillance. Traditional approaches often treat these as separate functions, but savvy compliance teams are recognizing the connections.
Modern surveillance systems should consider monitoring communications for:
Here's where human judgment becomes crucial. An AI system might flag every mention of "cash deposit" as suspicious. But experienced compliance professionals can distinguish between legitimate discussions about customer banking habits and potentially problematic patterns that warrant further investigation.
AI tools excel at scanning communications for names, entities, and jurisdictions appearing on sanctions lists. However, humans are essential for handling:
FINRA Rule 2210 creates specific obligations for reviewing marketing communications, and this area particularly benefits from human-AI collaboration. The stakes are high—marketing violations can result in significant regulatory action and reputational damage.
Artificial intelligence can dramatically speed up initial marketing review by:
However, marketing compliance requires nuanced judgment that only humans can provide:
For example, an AI tool might flag every mention of "tax benefits" in marketing materials. A human reviewer can quickly determine whether these references include appropriate disclosures about tax advice limitations and individual circumstances—critical distinctions that could mean the difference between compliant marketing and regulatory violations.
White paper → Considering AI solutions for your business? Ask the right questions.
The compliance community rightly worries about over-reliance on AI systems. AI systems trained on biased or incomplete data may produce skewed results, potentially creating regulatory blind spots or unfairly impacting certain client populations.
Leading firms address these concerns through:
Remember, investment advisers and brokers must uphold fiduciary obligations regardless of what technology they use. The SEC's recent guidance makes clear that AI tools cannot override these duties, even if they streamline workflows. This means human judgment remains essential for:
Ready to build a defensible human-AI surveillance framework? Here's a practical roadmap:
Firms that successfully implement human-AI collaboration in surveillance gain several significant advantages:
Scalability Without Sacrifice: Handle growing communication volumes without proportionally increasing compliance costs or compromising review quality.
Regulatory Confidence: Demonstrate to regulators that your surveillance program combines technological efficiency with human judgment—in line with what they want to see.
Risk Reduction: Catch more potential violations while reducing false positives that waste precious compliance resources.
Operational Excellence: Free up compliance professionals to focus on high-value activities like trend analysis, policy development, and staff training rather than manual review of routine communications.
As one compliance director at a major regional firm told me recently: "AI doesn't replace our judgment—it amplifies it. We're finding risks we would have missed and eliminating noise that used to consume our entire day."
The financial services industry is still in the early stages of understanding how to effectively blend AI capabilities with human expertise. But the direction is clear: firms that master this collaboration will have significant advantages in managing compliance costs, reducing regulatory risk, and maintaining operational efficiency.
The key is remembering that AI is a tool, not a replacement for human judgment. FINRA's StratIntel team puts it well—the goal is to "uncover risks and opportunities" through collaborative intelligence, not to remove humans from the equation.
By maintaining a human-in-the-loop approach while leveraging AI's processing power, firms can build surveillance programs that are both defensible to regulators and practical for daily operations. That's a combination that helps protect both your firm and your clients—which is exactly what effective compliance should accomplish.
Remember, the firms succeeding in this space aren't just buying AI tools—they're thoughtfully integrating them into human-centered compliance programs. That integration, done right, creates surveillance capabilities that neither humans nor AI could achieve alone.
If you're thinking about integrating AI into your firm's risk and compliance programs, I encourage you to read this white paper: Considering AI solutions for your business? Ask the right questions.
The opinions provided are those of the author and not necessarily those of Saifr or its affiliates. Saifr and any other third parties are independent entities and not affiliated. Mentioning them does not suggest a recommendation or endorsement by Saifr.
1209133.1.0