In many ways compliance officers’ responsibilities have become more challenging as the result of technology. Whether it’s trying to adequately ensure records are kept, trying to limit communications to approved channels, or navigating the evolving landscape of advertising in the age of social media, the challenges seem to be growing. Now, the open question for many compliance officers is whether large language models (LLMs) will make their jobs easier or harder. LLMs have the potential to revolutionize compliance processes and reviews, but they also present a set of unique challenges. Given the wide scope of activities that many compliance officers must address, including the Bank Secrecy Act, Securities Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, FINRA Rules, and Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, among potential others depending on the institution, the hope is that LLMs can augment existing policies and procedures and lighten compliance officers’ burdens. In this article, I will explore the potential benefits LLMs can offer and also address some concerns surrounding their implementation.
White paper | Considering AI solutions for your business? Ask the right questions.
While AI offers numerous benefits, its implementation in the compliance field is not without challenges and concerns. The following are some key issues that financial compliance officers and institutions must address:
Compliance officers face an increasingly complex and ever-changing regulatory landscape. LLMs potentially hold great promise in helping to streamline compliance processes, enhance efficiency, and mitigate risks. However, the implementation of any LLM in compliance comes with its own set of challenges, including transparency, data quality, regulatory compliance, and the need for human oversight. By addressing these issues proactively, financial institutions can harness the full potential of LLMs while maintaining robust and ethical compliance programs.
Are you considering AI solutions for your business? Make sure to ask the right questions.
The opinions provided are those of the author and not necessarily those of Fidelity Investments or its affiliates.
1095651.1.0